In this post-award bid protest case, a task order from the Department of Labor seeking quotations for the maintenance and operation of its Integrated Management Information System drew three contractors. The winner, Microtechnologies, LLC, bid almost $40 million. A rival, Med Trends, Inc, bid almost $17 million – less than half as much. Remarkably, the high bidder won. The case is Med Trends, Inc. v. United States, 2011 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1872 (September 13, 2011).
The Agency considered the bids on a “best value” analysis, wherein price (obviously) was less important than other factors. It relied heavily on its independent government cost estimate (“IGCE”), which was based on historical contracting pricing data from other, similar contracts.
Med Trends argued that the Agency’s price analysis and its best-value tradeoff were both arbitrary and capricious and, therefore, unreasonable.
The Court held that the price analysis was not arbitrary or capricious. Med Trends had argued that the price comparison failed to be adjusted to material difference between the terms of the acquisitions – that the analysis was not necessarily an “apples to apples” comparison. The Court wrote that there was nothing in the record proving this was the case and that the FAR specifically allows the use of an IGCE absent evidence to the contrary.
The Court held that the best-value tradeoff was not arbitrary or capricious. Med Trends had argued that the best-value tradeoff was really based solely on price quotations and the IGCE. It also argued that the Contracting Officer did not analyze, as was promised in a published Q&A, the quality of the contractor’s Level of Effort estimates. The Court wrote that the Contracting Officer, using a rating system of technical approach, past performance, and price, had a rational basis for awarding the contract to Microtechnologies due to its superior ratings and despite the significant difference in price. The Court disagreed with Med Trends that the Q&A promised any special analysis.
This case is being appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in order to test the common reliance by the government on IGCEs. For policy reasons, it does seem odd that an agency can estimate how much something should cost and then treat a low price bid by a contractor as a negative factor. This effectively creates a bias against contractor efficiencies and taxpayer savings. Just because “we always did it that way” doesn’t mean that a future contractor can’t “do it better.”
Dave Albo – Attorney are bid protest attorneys and government contracts lawyers.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on Google
AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on Google
TomDave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on Google
kendall carpenterDave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Google
Amanda StallardRetaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Google
Mark WestMr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on Google
MDavid was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on Google
mitquinn88Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on Google
G RThanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Google
Hope CarriganI am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Google
Doug DamronDave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.
