Two large food distributors interested in competing for a $9.3 million contract to supply food to military and civilian customers in Texas and New Mexico win their pre-award bid protest against the Army’s Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support. They successfully argued that the DLA’s waiver of the general requirement that government contracts conform with customary commercial practices in the industry was applied irrationally. The case is U.S. Foodservice, Inc. and Labatt Food Service, L.P. v.United States, 2011 U.S.Claims LEXIS 2009 (October 12, 2011).
The DLA was concerned about fraud connected to the procurement of food supplies. The lack of transparency in the prices offered to the government makes it difficult to determine if the government is overpaying. In an effort to standardize pricing in a manner that the government could monitor, the DLA sought and obtained a “class waiver.” This is a special procedure under FAR 12.302 that permit a government agency to obtain an exception to the general rule under FAR 12.301 that government acquisitions of commercial items be consistent with customary commercial practices. After obtaining its waiver, it sought to alter the pricing formula generally used by food distributors.
U.S. Foodservice and Labatt Food Service complained that the waiver was irrationally obtained and applied. Their best argument was that, as distributors, they didn’t have control over the prices manufacturers charged its customers. They were simply middlemen.
The Court of Federal Claims held that DLA properly obtained the class waiver. It found that the Agency’s goal of increasing transparency of the procurement process to cut down incidences of fraud was a legitimate procurement objective. (Expect to see more and more such waivers. USF argued that an agency could always argue that the possibility of fraud justifies a departure from customary commercial practices, eviscerating the requirement that such practices be followed by the government. They are probably right. However, this Court followed the recent precedents of two decisions from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that blessed such waivers. These decisions are CHE Consulting, Inc. v.United States, 552 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2008) and Weeks Marine, Inc. v. United States, 575 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2009)).
However, even though the Court held that the class waiver was proper, it also held that the waiver had to be applied rationally. It was this latter point the resulted in the successful bid protest. The solicitation with the waiver required offerors to provide the agency with “most favored customer” (“MFC”) pricing. Common in GSA contracts, a MFC clause requires that the contractor sell to the government at a price equal to or less than it sells to its lowest paying commercial customer. USF and Labatt successfully argued that this was impossible. In the foodservice industry manufacturers fix prices with the customer, not the distributor. Thus, the DLA was forcing distributors to guarantee prices over which they had no control. The Court held that this was not a rational application of the Agency’s class waiver to combat fraud. The Court sustained the bid protest and ordered the DLA to cancel its solicitation containing the MFC clause.
————————————
Dave Albo – Attorney are bid protest attorneys and government contracts lawyers.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on Google
AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on Google
TomDave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on Google
kendall carpenterDave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Google
Amanda StallardRetaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Google
Mark WestMr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on Google
MDavid was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on Google
mitquinn88Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on Google
G RThanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Google
Hope CarriganI am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Google
Doug DamronDave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.
