A disappointed government contractor lost its bid protest, and the Court of Federal Claims explained the law on responsibility and responsiveness in offers to requests for proposals (“RFP”). The case is Nilson Van & Storage, Inc. v. United States, 2011 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1710.
Nilson Van & Storage, Inc. (“Nilson Van”) lost a government contract for the preparation, shipment, and storage of property belonging to Army personnel, to Ken Krause Company. Nilson Van complained that Ken Krause was “non-responsible” because it didn’t have the proper licenses and certifications, or the proper storage facilities, at the time of bidding. It also claimed that Ken Krause’s offer was “non-responsive” to the solicitation because the RFP required proper registration with certain government contractor databases, which Ken Krause didn’t have.
The Court explained the meaning and application of “non-responsibility” and “non-responsiveness.”
“Non-responsibility” is determined based on whether an offeror can actually fulfill the contract – for example, does the company have the necessary facilities or ability to obtain them?
“Non-responsiveness” is determined based on an offer’s contents at bid opening. To be considered “responsive” a bid must comply in all material respects with the invitation for bids. The key is “material.” Minor defects can be overlooked. The determination of whether a defect in a bid is material is up to the agency. Also, a contracting officer can waive or permit a party to cure minor irregularities.
Applying the law in this case as to “responsibility,” the Court ruled that the permit problem was a non-issue. The actual work was unlikely to involve interstate transport, necessitating the missing permit at issue. Also, the solicitation and FAR, when read together, did not require Ken Krause to have necessary permits at the time of bidding, but rather at the time of performance. (This begs the question – doesn’t this leave the government in a bind if they award a contract to a company who is ultimately unable to get the proper permit? Why shouldn’t a company who already has its permits enjoy this as a competitive advantage?) The Court said that the storage facilities problem was a non-issue because Ken Krause, who had put the wrong facilities on its offer, ultimately gave the agency the correct facilities during the evaluation state of the bids. (This is a good example of an offeror saving his bid by paying attention to details and speaking up even after submitting an offer).
Applying the law in this case as to “responsiveness,” the court similarly ruled that while Ken Krause was not listed in the Central Contractor Registration database (“CCR”) at the time of the bid, they were so listed at the time of the award, and this was sufficient. (Again, this highlights the need for a company to be on the ball and not be shy about correcting its offers even after the offer is submitted). Implicit in this decision, although not stated, was the determination that the contracting officer effectively permitted the Ken Krause to “cure.”
———————————
Dave Albo – Attorney are government contract lawyers and procurement law attorneys.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on Google
AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on Google
TomDave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on Google
kendall carpenterDave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Google
Amanda StallardRetaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Google
Mark WestMr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on Google
MDavid was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on Google
mitquinn88Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on Google
G RThanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Google
Hope CarriganI am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Google
Doug DamronDave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.
