     EXCELLENT

Contractor Wins Bid Protest for a Second Time Because Agency Doesn’t Document Its Decisionmaking

A government contractor wins its second bid protest in a row at the Court of Federal Claims. In this latest instance, it won because the agency, the Army, failed to document its evaluation and came across to the Court as incompetent and mismanaged. In a very critical opinion against the United States Army Engineering & Support Center, the Court of Federal Claims wrote:

“The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that “best value” solicitations, such as the one at issue here, afford the contracting officer a great deal of discretion, “so that the relative merit of competing proposals is primarily a matter of administrative discretion[.]” Galen Med. Assoc. Inc. v. United States, 369 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2004). That discretion, however, does not allow the procuring agency the liberty to deviate from the Solicitation’s requirements, ignore applicable Federal Acquisitions Regulations (“FAR”), or ascertain “best value” in a manner that is arbitrary. Nor does that discretion allow the court to overlook the fact that the
Administrative Record does not contain sufficient information on which an agency could even make a rational procurement decision. See Vernon J. Edwards, Complexity and Incompetence: The Revelations of a Failed Acquisition, Nash & Cibinic Report, Dec. 2012, at 186 (describing incompetence and mismanagement in the procurement process). But, that is what happened in this
case.” Ouch!

In this case, the winning bid protest contractor, Linc Government Services, LLC, complained that the Army failed to adequately consider 23 “betterments” as to technical factors in their offer. A “betterment,” in this Solicitation, meant “portions of the accepted proposal which both conform to and exceed the provisions of the [S]olicitation.” In addition, the Solicitation required that the Army recognize as a “betterment” an “offer [that provides] additional value to the [Army].”

The Court correctly recognized that the Army held most of the cards. It seemed inclined to defer to the agency’s judgment regarding the value of each “betterment.” The Army lost because it didn’t show that the Army really considered each one. In many instances there was nothing in the administrative record indicating that the “betterment” was considered at all.

Client Reviews

    
 
 
       Posted on Google  
   
   Anonymous 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year).

I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious.

I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial.

* Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course

* Take a Behavior Modification Course

* Do 100 hours of community service

* Print my DMV Record one week before the trial

On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me.

No criminal record.
No jail time.
No suspension of license.

I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing.

Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Tom 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave albo it's a fantastic lawyer.
He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets.
I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   kendall carpenter 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Amanda Stallard 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Retaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Mark West 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   M 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. David was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   mitquinn88 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   G R 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case.  I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure.  From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed.  He  simply could not have done a better job.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Hope Carrigan 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and  grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Doug Damron 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.