In a recent unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit decided that a significant portion of an employee’s lawsuit should have proceeded when she was terminated just six days after she complained about age discrimination at work. The case is Buchhagen v. ICF International, Inc., et al., and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit overturned a District Court’s decision to dismiss the worker’s claims for wrongful discharge and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).
Under federal law, a court should only grant a motion to dismiss a complaint at the onset of litigation if the complaint does not allege any facts that could plausibly state a legal claim. Nevertheless, whether to dismiss the employee’s age discrimination claim was a close question because the employee alleged that the same supervisor that ultimately fired her had hired her when she was 64 years old and had also provided her with a significantly higher salary than the one originally offered. Although these facts lent support to the company’s argument that the company did not discriminate against the employee, the Court reiterated that it is obliged to accept the employee’s factual allegations as true at the start of litigation. Accordingly, the employee was plausibly entitled to relief for unlawful age discrimination because the employee was 67 years old when she was fired and was replaced by a substantially younger employee.
The District Court also erred by dismissing the employee’s retaliatory discharge claim because the employee was fired only six days after complaining about age discrimination to the company’s human resources representatives. In order to establish retaliation, an employee must have engaged in “protected oppositional activity.” Here, the employee’s complaint to HR was protected because the employee’s belief that the company violated the ADEA was “reasonable.” In other words, even if the company’s actions do not ultimately amount to unlawful age discrimination, Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision protects activity in opposition to employment actions that an employee reasonably believes to be unlawful. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit held that her retaliation claim should not have been dismissed.
Although the employee’s wrongful discharge and retaliation claims were reinstated, the Fourth Circuit did agree with the District Court’s dismissal of the employee’s hostile work environment claim. The employee alleged that her supervisor “mockingly” yelled at her during one meeting, harped on her mistakes, made snide comments, played favorites, and unfairly scrutinized her work. Such allegations fell “far short” of being severe or pervasive. In relying upon its earlier precedent, the Court reminded employees that “workplaces are not always harmonious locales, and … bruised or wounded feelings will not . . . satisfy the severe or pervasive standard.”
After this decision, the employee’s wrongful discharge and retaliation claims were remanded back to the District Court to proceed with litigation.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on Google
AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on Google
TomDave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on Google
kendall carpenterDave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Google
Amanda StallardRetaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Google
Mark WestMr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on Google
MDavid was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on Google
mitquinn88Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on Google
G RThanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Google
Hope CarriganI am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Google
Doug DamronDave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.
