Felony Lawyer Fairfax, VA
Broadly speaking, there are six types of homicide charges. These are important to understand because even if you were already charged with one type of homicide, the prosecutor could escalate your charge to something more serious. Conversely, with the help of our Fairfax, VA felony lawyer from the law firm of Dave Albo – Attorney, your charges could potentially be reduced. Regardless of what type of homicide charge you are facing, it’s critically important to obtain quality legal representation. The seriousness of any homicide charge demands this, given the potential consequences you face if convicted. Call us without delay to arrange a free and confidential case review with our skilled criminal defense attorney felony lawyer. The sooner you call, the sooner we can begin to protect your rights.
Homicide Charges – Categories:
- Involuntary manslaughter. If someone engages in a form of reckless behavior that unintentionally results in the death of someone, that person might be charged with manslaughter. This is a class 4 felony.
- Voluntary manslaughter. This is a homicide that a person committed when they were in the heat of passion or anger and as a result could not control their actions. This is a class 3 felony.
- Vehicular homicide. If someone is at fault for causing a car accident that results in killing one or more persons, they may be charged with this type of homicide. If the liable driver was sober but driving recklessly, it is considered a class 4 felony. If the at-fault driver was under the influence of alcohol or drugs and had a blood alcohol content (BAC) of at least .08, it is a class 3 felony. If the BAC was between .05 and .08, then there may be an additional charge for reckless driving which is also a felony.
- Criminally negligent homicide. Even if a person did not intend to kill someone but they were engaged in criminal behavior, they may be charged with this type of homicide. This is a class 5 felony unless the victim was disabled, and in which case it will be a class 4 felony.
- Second degree murder. If someone intentionally killed someone, they can be charged with murder. Under the following circumstances, they may be charged with second degree murder:
- A murder that reflected the killer’s indifference to the victim’s life.
- A murder that occurred after the killer intended to seriously harm the victim.
- A murder that was not planned but occurred because the killer had malice and intention to harm.
- First degree murder. This is a class 1 felony and the minimum punishment for a conviction is life imprisonment. If the victim was a firefighter, emergency medical technician, or a peace officer then the defendant will be charged with additional offenses.
If you have been charged with homicide, or believe you may be soon charged, contact a Fairfax, VA felony lawyer immediately. Our legal team will arrange a free consultation for you with our skilled Fairfax, VA felony lawyer that community members in need of a strong legal defense have turned to for help since 1988.
Marijuana use for medicinal and/or recreational purposes has become legal in numerous states across the U.S. in recent years. However, this shift in policy does not mean that marijuana use is legal for all persons and in all contexts. For example, it is still illegal for minors to use marijuana and it is still illegal for drivers to have a certain level of marijuana in their systems while they are operating their vehicles. Just as it is illegal to drive with a level of alcohol in one’s blood that suggests one may be impaired, so it is illegal to drive with an amount of marijuana in one’s blood that suggests one is impaired. As this area of law is still evolving, the threshold for what level of marijuana in the blood suggests impairment still varies from state to state and circumstance to circumstance. As a result, it is important to consult with an experienced Fairfax, Virginia felony attorney if you have questions and/or you have been cited for driving under the influence of marijuana. In some situations, any trace of marijuana at all could result in a DWI charge, while in other situations, a higher concentration must be present before criminal consequences may be imposed.
Driving After Marijuana Use – The Basics
It is important to contact an experienced Fairfax, VA felony attorney if you are a marijuana user and have questions about what levels of marijuana in your blood may get you cited for marijuana use. It is also important to speak with an attorney immediately if you have been cited for driving while impaired. The criminal consequences associated with an impaired driving conviction may be severe. If you need to drive in order to work, your livelihood may be threatened by such a conviction. And anyone convicted of impaired driving may face fines, community service requirements and even jail time. Driving while impaired is not a reality to be taken lightly. It should be treated seriously and with focused intention. Seeking experienced legal guidance from a Fairfax, VA felony attorney will help you to achieve that end.
It is also important to understand that no matter what, you should avoid driving with marijuana in your system if you have kids in your car. Even if you are a medical marijuana patient and even if you only have traces of the drug in your blood, you could potentially be charged with child endangerment. If you and your child’s other parent are no longer together and you drive with your child in the car (with traces of marijuana in your blood), this reality could even impact your child custody arrangement. Do not risk this outcome.
Initial Charge.
Usually with a Felony, if you are arrested, you will be taken to the Magistrate. The Magistrate listens to the facts as stated by the police, looks at your criminal record and determines if you should be released pending trial. (Release is called “bail” or “bond”) For serious crimes of violence, there is a presumption against bond. For non-violent crimes, the Magistrate looks at whether you have a long criminal record, whether you have failed to appear in the past, your ties to the community, work history and other factors. The Magistrate is trying to determine if you will show up to subsequent hearings. If the Magistrate is sure you will show up, he will issue a “personal recognizance bond”, which is basically just a promise to show up. Otherwise the Magistrate will ask for a cash bond. If, for example, the Magistrate orders a cash bond of $5,000, that means that you must pay $5,000 to get out of jail pending trial. If you have $5000 cash, you just pay it. If not, then you can hire a bail bond company. They will put up the $5,000 and charge a fee to you of 10%. If at the end of the case, you have appeared at all hearings, then the $5,000 is returned to the person who paid it (e.g. you, your family member or friend who may have paid on your behalf, or the bail bond company.) If the bail is set too high, then you can ask for a bond reduction hearing in the General District Court to see if a Judge will over rule the Magistrate. That decision can be appealed again to the Circuit Court.
Arraignment Hearing.
Most courts have an Arraignment Hearing. This is merely a day where a Judge specifically tells you what you have been charged with and sets the next court date for the Preliminary Hearing. At this time the Judge will inquire whether you plan to hire his own attorney or if you cannot afford an attorney, have you interviewed for a court appointed attorney.
Preliminary Hearing
At a Preliminary Hearing the only issue is whether or not the court finds sufficient cause to believe that an offense occurred and sufficient cause to believe you are the one who committed it. If the court does find sufficient cause, the court will then certify the charge to the next grand jury that meets. (Sufficient cause is the same thing as probable cause. I refer to it simply because that is the term used in the statute. However, the terms are used interchangeably).
The issue for the court is not guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but sufficient cause, which is a low burden. It is important to note that the Commonwealth is not required to put on all their evidence at your Preliminary Hearing, but only enough evidence for the court to believe sufficient cause exists. Rarely do defense attorneys put on evidence during a Preliminary Hearing. Why give the Prosecution “heads up” on your case? Rather, a good defense attorney uses the Preliminary Hearing to get additional information to help me defend you at the ultimate trial.
You have the ability to waive (give up) your right to a Preliminary Hearing. Waiving your right merely indicates that you recognize that there is enough evidence for sufficient cause. It is not an admission of guilt. Waiving your right to a Preliminary Hearing may be done in the event the Commonwealth makes a plea offer that you find attractive. (Note: A little more detail on “Plea Offers” / “Plea Agreements” / “Plea Bargains”. Whether or not to accept any plea offers in this case is your decision alone. Your attorney is required to present all plea offers from the government to you whether I think they are good deals or not. Your attorney can, of course, advise you to any pleas the Commonwealth offers and make recommendations. It is also important to note that the Commonwealth is not required to make any offers whatsoever.)
Subsequent Proceedings
Grand Jury
After a Preliminary Hearing, the case is submitted to a Grand Jury. It is interesting to note that a Prosecutor does not actually charge you. A Prosecutor presents the evidence to a Grand Jury and the citizens sitting in the Grand Jury determine if there is enough evidence to charge. The Grand Jury is a jury of six individuals that make the same determination that the District Court judge did – whether or not there is probable cause. If they find it, then they will hand down what is called a true bill of indictment. The Grand Jury proceedings are “secret” proceedings. Attorneys do not have a right to be present while the witnesses are testifying to the Grand Jury. Furthermore, an attorney does not have a right to any transcript from the proceeding itself. Only the Prosecutor goes to the Grand Jury, so naturally, they only hear once side of the case. It is rare that a Grand Jury does not certify a charge.
Term Day
If the Grand Jury hands down true bills of indictment, then you will be required to appear in the Circuit Court in person for Term Day. If you are not incarcerated you will need to be present in court on the date assigned by the District Court judge. The purpose of this will be to set a trial date and either demand or waive a jury.
The United States and Virginia Constitutions grant you the right to a jury trial. Of course, you can give up that right and ask to be tried by the judge. Understand, however, that the Commonwealth can ask for a jury. If the prosecutor asks for one, then even if you have given up your right to a jury trial, then you will be tried by a jury.
The chief differences between a judge and jury trial is that a judge trial requires only one vote to convict or acquit (the judge). Conversely at a jury trial a jury of 12 people must be unanimous to convict or acquit. (If they can’t make up their mind they are a “hung jury” and the case is retried later before a different jury if the prosecutor wishes). Also, if convicted at a judge trial, the judge will consult the sentencing guidelines before sentencing you. While they are discretionary, the judge must write an explanation as to why he or she deviates from it. Usually, judges sentence within the guideline range. However, a jury is not given any guidelines. Whatever the 12 jurors unanimously vote to impose is likely to be the sentence. Virginia judges can reduce a jury sentence, but usually don’t. Judges cannot impose a greater sentence than a jury sentence.
Trial
At trial (assuming a jury trial), the process begins with voir dire where a prospective panel of jurors are asked questions by the judge, the prosecutor, and your defense attorney. The purpose is to select jurors that are free from bias or otherwise fit to serve. After questions are asked, the attorneys move to strike jurors for cause – meaning that there is some basis in the law on which they are not fit to sit as a juror.
After the strikes for cause, 20 potential jurors are selected before the parties go to strike eight others. Each side – the defense and the prosecution – get four of the eight strikes. A juror can be struck for almost any reason. (Exceptions are things like racial discrimination – a lawyer cannot strike a person because of his race, for example). That would leave 12 individuals to be on the jury panel who will decide the facts of your case.
After the jurors are selected, there are opening statements by both sides. Then, the Commonwealth will get to put on their evidence. Evidence is usually testimony from witnesses and other evidence, such as scientific evidence. You will be able to watch the entire trial. Other witnesses will have to wait outside the courtroom, entering only for their own testimony.
The Defense can make a “Motion to Strike” after the Commonwealth rests its case. A Motion to Strike is, in essence, saying that the evidence is insufficient to establish a prima facia case (this is a Latin term for “a basic case”) that should be submitted to jury. To win a Motion to Strike, you would have to show that there is absolutely no evidence on an element of the crime. For example, your Defense Attorney may argue, “There is no evidence whatsoever that the Defendant sold the drugs.” All a Prosecutor would have to show is one piece of evidence, such as, “The Wegman’s employee says she saw me steal groceries.” If the Prosecutor can show only one piece of evidence, the case continues to move on.
The Defense can then put on evidence if it wishes, can renew its Motion to Strike, and closing arguments are made. There is no requirement for the Defense to put on any evidence. You cannot be called by either the prosecutor or your lawyer to testify if you don’t want to do so. You have the absolute right to remain silent. I, of course, will advise you and make recommendations in this regard.
What is important to note is that in the event you have a jury trial, as opposed to a Judge trial, the jury decides to convict, the same jury will get to decide punishment. Any sentence the jury renders within the range of punishment is allowed. We then have the right to request a presentence investigation report and have a sentencing hearing.
Sentencing Hearing
Hopefully, you will not need to go to this because you were found not guilty. But if you were found guilty, the next stage is the sentencing hearing, the Court may reduce the sentence or suspend a portion of the time recommended by the jury. It cannot impose a higher sentence. Often, judges impose the recommended sentence of the jury and say, “… the jury is comprised of members of the Fairfax County community and the sentence they gave is the statement of the community. I will not alter their statement of punishment.”
If your trial is by a Judge, then at the sentencing hearing, the judge looks at the sentencing guidelines just as if you had plead guilty. The judge then determines the punishment.
Appeal Rights
Appeal rights are determined by the outcome of a trial or plea. In the event a person pleads guilty, he waives virtually all rights and, consequently, he may waive a right to an appeal. The only meritorious issues, which might survive for appeal after a guilty plea are a lack of jurisdiction by the court or illegal punishment. An illegal punishment would be one which exceeds the maximum punishment permitted by law. If you plead guilty, I will notify you if either of these matters are an issue in your case.
In the event the matter is tried, and if you are found guilty, the issues that can be raised on appeal are legal errors that are in the record of your case. Please note that an appeal is not a new trial. No new evidence or testimony can be taken at any stage of an appeal.
Whether or not to appeal a case is your decision, and if you tell me to appeal then I must do so, even if there is virtually no chance of success on appeal. If an appealed case lacks any meritorious issues, I will be ethically required to request permission to withdraw from your case once the appeal has been filed.
Criminal Defense Guidance Is Available
If you have questions about driving while impaired by the use of marijuana or you have recently been cited with a related charge, please do not hesitate to contact an experienced Fairfax, VA criminal attorney today. Even in states where medical and/or recreational marijuana use is legal, you may be cited for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of this drug. However, it is important to understand that you may be able to work with an attorney to prevent a citation from occurring, to mount a successful defense to an existing citation or to mitigate any potential consequences associated with this kind of citation. The sooner you act, the more time you will have to work with your Fairfax, VA felony attorney to construct a legal strategy that is as strong as possible. So, please do not wait. Connect with Dave Albo – Attorney today.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on TomTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on kendall carpenterTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Amanda StallardTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Retaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Mark WestTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. David was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on mitquinn88Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on G RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Hope CarriganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Doug DamronTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.