A government contractor wins its post-award protest where the agency failed to adequately document its “best value” analysis. This is the latest of a string of recent successful bid protests wherein the government loses on the basis of poor documentation. The case is Standard Communications, Inc. v.United Statesand CACI-ISS, Inc. and SAIC, No. 11-530 C (November 22, 2011).
The Department of Veteran’s Affairs issued a Request for Proposals for its Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology (“T4”) Program. The RFP sought proposals regarding “a total IT services solution encompassing, but not limited to software and IT products incidental to the solution, in conjunction with all services needed to integrate a system, network, or other IT services in order to meet [DVA’s] mission requirements.
The DVA anticipated entering into an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, Multiple Award Task Order contract with a five-year period of performance. The RFP provided for a maximum selection of fifteen awardees, with at least four contracts being awarded to Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSM) and at least three being awarded to Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSM). The value of this contract was $12 billion with a minimum of $50,000 guaranteed to each awardee. The award was to be made on “best value” based on five criteria. Price was the lowest weighed criteria.
Standard Communications bid and lost to other contractors. It filed a post-award bid protest arguing that the DVA violated the law by failing to document its “best value” analysis. The FAR specifically requires documentation of the tradeoff process at 15.308. This documentation must do more than “parrot back the strengths and weaknesses of the competing proposals – rather, the agency must dig deeper and determine whether the relative strengths and weaknesses of the competing proposals are such that it is worth paying a higher price.” Moreover, “as the magnitude of the price differential between offerors increases, the relative benefits yielded by the higher-priced offer must also increase.”
In this case, with regard to some of the contract awards, this documentation (in a non-conclusory form) did not exist. The Court of Federal Claims insisted that agencies must state why a proposal’s technical superiority does not warrant a premium. It is not enough to say simply that it doesn’t. Therefore, the bid protest was sustained.
Interestingly, Standard Communications also complained that the DVA violated the Veterans First Program which, when applicable, requires that a procuring entity give SDVOSB concerns priority over VOSB concerns. However, Standard Communications waived this argument by filing a “post-award” bid protest rather than a “pre-award bid protest.” The lesson for government contractors is that they shouldn’t wait to file a protest once they learn that the rules of the solicitation are improper. Delay results in wavier.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on Google
AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on Google
TomDave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on Google
kendall carpenterDave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Google
Amanda StallardRetaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Google
Mark WestMr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on Google
MDavid was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on Google
mitquinn88Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on Google
G RThanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Google
Hope CarriganI am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Google
Doug DamronDave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.
