     EXCELLENT

Federal Court Slams Down Army for Following Informal Advice of GAO Lawyer on Corrective Actions in a Bid Protest

When the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) recommends that a government agency take “corrective action” in procurement by making changes to its selection criteria or process, the Court of Federal Claims will routinely adjudicate challenges to the proposed corrective action. But, what if the agency takes corrective action in response to a GAO attorney’s informal advice that doing so was necessary and not in response to a formal GAO decision?

The Court of Federal Claims, in a case of first impression, held that the federal court could review a GAO attorney’s informal advice. The case is Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 2011 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1784 (2011). It sustained a bid protest and ordered that the contract go to the protestor.

In SA-TECH, the United States Army Aviation and Missile Life Cycle Management Command Contracting Center awarded a contract for aerial target flight operations and maintenance services to SA-TECH, unseating the incumbent contractor, Madison Research Corporation (owned by Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (“Kratos”)).

Upset at being unseated, Kratos filed a GAO protest. A GAO attorney, reviewing Kratos’s claims, believed that Kratos had a point. In an e-mail to the agency, the lawyer (1) opined that the agency didn’t need to be concerned that Kratos allegedly missed an important filing deadline and (2) that the GAO would likely sustain Kratos’s protest due to deficiencies in the source selection decision. Based on this e-mail, the Army decided to take corrective action by terminating the contract to SA-TECH, reopening the original solicitation, and amending the solicitation. After the amendments, offerors would be permitted to revise their technical and cost proposals. It was a new source selection procedure.

Now, SA-TECH was upset and filed a bid protest to the Court of Federal Claims arguing that the Army’s decision to take corrective action was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable because the GAO’s attorney’s e-mail message to do so was itself unreasonable. It also asserted that the corrective action, standing on its own, lacked a rational basis and involves a violation of law, regulation or procedure.

The Court agreed and held that it did have jurisdiction to adjudicate this claim based on informal advice of the GAO lawyer even though the GAO hadn’t made a formal decision. Therefore, it was appropriate for SA-TECH to protest the proposed corrective action. Since there was no basis for downplaying the filing deadline issue or considering the source selection decision deficient, the Court ordered that the Army award the contract to SA-TECH. The bid protester won.

Client Reviews

    
 
 
       Posted on Google  
   
   Anonymous 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Tom 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   kendall carpenter 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Amanda Stallard 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Retaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Mark West 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   M 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. David was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   mitquinn88 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   G R 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case.  I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure.  From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed.  He  simply could not have done a better job.
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Hope Carrigan 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and  grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!
  
 
      Posted on Google  
   
   Doug Damron 
 
 
 
 Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.