Drug Lawyer in Fairfax Virginia
DEBUNKING THE MYTH THAT “THERE ARE NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS WHO WERE CHARGED WITH POSSESSION OF NARCOTICS OR MARIJUANA IN VIRGINIA PRISONS” – NOT!
If I had a nickel for every time I heard a politician or a political activist say, “There are thousands of people in prison for Possession of Drugs or Possession of Marijuana,” I would be able to buy a Bugatti Chiron for $3,000,000. (Well, of course, that is a ridiculous exaggeration, but no more ridiculous that the claim that in Virginia, there are thousands of non-violent people in our prisons charged with Possession of Narcotics or Possession of Marijuana.) So here are the facts.
I am presently a Drug Lawyer in Fairfax Virginia, defending people who have unfortunately be charged with Possession of Drugs / Narcotics or Marijuana. When they come to my office they are always afraid of going to prison because they have heard over and over and over people say that non-violent drug possession lands people in prison. In short, in Virginia, it is nearly impossible to get one millisecond in prison (or even in jai) for Possession of Drugs (e.g. Cocaine, Crack, Heroin, Prescription Medications without a prescription, Ecstasy (a.k.a. MDMA or Molly); Opioids, PCP, etc. etc.
I served in the Virginia House of Delegates from 1994 – 2017. I was Chairman of the Courts of Justice (“Judiciary”) Committee that oversaw criminal justice in Virginia. In 2013, we commissioned a study to look at whether there were non-violent offenders in Virginia prisons. And here is what we found: In this study year of 2013, there were only 724 people (2%) out of 36,647 in prison for Possession of Drugs. In my opinion, even 2% is too much. No one should ever get prison for first offense drug possession. They should get treatment. So, we looked closely at this 764 people. And we found that almost zero were in prison for first offense possession. Why is that? Because any good Drug Lawyer Fairfax County Virginia knows there is a statute that allows a person to avoid a conviction altogether if they get treatment and have negative drug tests for a year. This is called a “251 Disposition” after the Code Section 18.2-251. This states:
§ 18.2-251. Persons charged with first offense may be placed on probation; conditions; substance abuse screening, assessment treatment and education programs or services; drug tests; costs and fees; violations; discharge.
Whenever any person who has not previously been convicted of any criminal offense under this article or under any statute of the United States or of any state relating to narcotic drugs, marijuana, or stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic drugs, or has not previously had a proceeding against him for violation of such an offense dismissed as provided in this section, or pleads guilty to or enters a plea of not guilty to possession of a controlled substance under § 18.2-250, the court, upon such plea if the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, may defer further proceedings and place him on probation upon terms and conditions. If the court defers further proceedings, at that time the court shall determine whether the clerk of court has been provided with the fingerprint identification information or fingerprints of the person, taken by a law enforcement officer pursuant to § 19.2-390, and, if not, shall order that the fingerprints and photograph of the person be taken by a law enforcement officer.
In short, the Judge makes a finding of guilt, but does not enter it and instead defers the case for either 6 months or a year. As the Drug Lawyer Fairfax County Virginia will explain to his client, if the Defendant stays clean, takes a class and maybe counseling, and has all negative drug tests during that period, the case gets dismissed.
What about second offense. Well, the second offense is then considered a “first offense” because the “first offense” was likely dismissed through that 251 Disposition. With first and second offenses, the Sentencing Guidelines recommend probation. So, it is quite unlikely that any prison time would be given.
Then, if they get charged a third time (which is really a fourth because of the 251 Disposition), maybe they some time in jail. Judges will do it for the Defendant’s own good, just to get them off the street and get treatment in jail.
So why does the study show that in 2013, were 764 people in prison for Possession of Drugs? Any Drug Lawyer Fairfax County Virginia can predict the reason. It MUST be one of the following: (1) Defendants who were multiple offenders (e.g. 4th+ offense) OR (2) Defendants who were charged with a worse charge like Distribution or Possession with the Intent to Distribute and took a plea bargain where the Prosecutor AND the Defendant AND the Defense Attorney all agreed that the charge would be reduced to Possession but prison time was required, OR (3) Defendant was charged with Possession but had a bad criminal record like prior Burglary or Distribution charges.
In short, I bet 99% of these 764 were NOT first offense Possession offenders. Thus, there is nearly no one in prison for first offense Possession of narcotics. (I say “nearly no one” because there could be an outlier. For example, a first time offender for some reason chose to go to trial and was found guilty by a Jury and the Jury gave him prison.) And if anyone says that any person gets jail for first offense Possession of Marijuana, that is even more laughable, because, for the same reasons as with drugs above, in Virginia, it does not happen. Also note that as of July 1, Possession of Marijuana < 1 oz is not even a crime and punishable by $25 fine.
So while you don’t want a conviction on your record, don’t let an attorney scare you into thinking you will go to prison for first offense Possession of Drugs. Hire an experienced Drug Lawyer in Fairfax Virginia who will give it to you straight. Contact Dave Albo – Attorney law firm.
Fill out the form and we’ll respond as soon as possible.
Posted on AnonymousTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was facing a charge of Reckless Driving for speeding on I66 at midnight. This is considered a Class 1 Misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. Having something like Reckless Driving on your record is on par with having a DUI. This charge also carries a chance for jail time (up to a year). I was incredibly scared because I had never faced such a charge. And looking into Virginia Law, my speed exceeded 90mph, which is quite serious. I retained Dave Albo to help me with this case. Since my record was clean, Dave had advised I do the following before my trial. * Take a DMV Driver's Improvement Course * Take a Behavior Modification Course * Do 100 hours of community service * Print my DMV Record one week before the trial On the day of my trial, Dave got my Reckless Driving charge REDUCED to a regular Speeding charge. This was the absolute best case scenario for me. No criminal record. No jail time. No suspension of license. I did receive 6 demerit points and had to pay a fine of $250 (plus court fees). But that's a slap on the wrist, compared to what I could have been facing. Thank you Dave Albo for helping me through this ordeal!Posted on TomTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave albo it's a fantastic lawyer. He has helped me twice now with great results both times with minor traffic tickets. I would recommend him to anybody including my family. He has great ethics and honesty which is what I look for in a lawyer .Posted on kendall carpenterTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave was my attorney recently for a car accident where I needed someone to represent me in court. After exchanging all necessary information he reassured me when the court date came that there wouldn’t be anything to worry about. On the day of court a couple problems arose and Dave was able to rectify them quickly, told me everything I need to say if needed and when it was all over he got my violation reduced significantly. I hope to never go to court again but if I do I will being calling Dave again.Posted on Amanda StallardTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Retaining the services of Mr. Albo for traffic court was probably the best decision I made. He is very responsive to emails, knowledgeable, and punctual. He provided excellent advice that eased the panic of having to go to the court house and stand before a judge. I am very happy with the outcome of my visit to traffic court and highly recommend Dave Albo.Posted on Mark WestTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Mr Albo was very professional and I was pleased with the outcome.Posted on MTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. David was incredible to work with from clear communication and next steps. To showing up to traffic court early to walk over all steps, making case in court as experienced/intelligent/well spoken lawyer. Lastly, he even followed after case in writing to confirm the outcome outlining everything that happened in lamen terms (in my case the best outcome we could ask for). I’m so appreciative to David.Posted on mitquinn88Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Absolutely top notch representation. Can't thank Dave enough for his knowledge and expertise.Posted on G RTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Thanks to Dave Albo for a fantastic job representing me and ensuring the best possible outcome for my case. I highly recommend him - you will be in good hands for sure. From start to finish he provided expert counsel and kept me well informed. He simply could not have done a better job.Posted on Hope CarriganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I am THRILLED with the outcome of my case, all thanks to Attorney Albo's superb expertise, excellent advice & sharp negotiating skills! I am extremely relieved and grateful; I highly recommend retaining his services. Well beyond worth it!!Posted on Doug DamronTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Dave did a great job representing me for my traffic court infraction! I wanted the best and his name came up as I searched for an attorney. Highly recommend him on all levels including a successful outcome to my case.